What kind of editing I did … and what kind of copy-pasting

Usually one or other message gave room for ramifications in answer, like “angryatheist” (fictitious example) saying:

The Bible is proven wrong by science, like astronomy, biology/evolution and language history.

I would tend to answer:

The Bible is proven wrong by science, like astronomy …

If you mean heliocentrism, I do not consider it science.

… biology/evolution …

I do not think biology validates evolution except on a small scale of change, so called micro-evolution.

… and language history.

I suppose you refer to languages usually changing in other ways than the new-language shock wave at tower of Babel. For my part I do not exclude miracles. And the miracle described does not say there were no further language changes after that.

Then the other guy would answer:

If you mean heliocentrism, I do not consider it science.

Hey, if you are geocentric, consider a shrink.

I do not think biology validates evolution except on a small scale of change, so called micro-evolution.

Right, huh! And what about dinosaurs that lived 60 million years before the Universe was created according to your Bible?

I suppose you refer to languages usually changing in other ways than the new-language shock wave at tower of Babel. For my part I do not exclude miracles. And the miracle described does not say there were no further language changes after that.

Qué?

After which I would get back like:

If you mean heliocentrism, I do not consider it science.

Hey, if you are geocentric, consider a shrink.

No thanks, but maybe you should, Shakespear said “he who is giddy thinks the world turns around”.

I do not think biology validates evolution except on a small scale of change, so called micro-evolution.

Right, huh! And what about dinosaurs that lived 60 million years before the Universe was created according to your Bible?

Who says these 60 million years are the true age of T. Rex et al.?

I suppose you refer to languages usually changing in other ways than the new-language shock wave at tower of Babel. For my part I do not exclude miracles. And the miracle described does not say there were no further language changes after that.

Qué?

The argument (already made twice or three times by dhux) usually goes: the tower of Babel is a myth explaining the difference of languages, but now we have another explanation as the one true namely slow language change, a k a linguistic evolution. My answer is that one miraculous language change, engendering heaps of new languages, does not stop these languages from further change later on, which is what linguists have observed later on.

I have then copy-pasted (Ctrl + C, Ctrl + V):

  • a) my opponents’ arguments, also giving them credit for them as in fictitious example “angryatheist” here (if there is a real user name “angryatheist” out there who argues more intelligently, I apologise)
  • b) my own answers to them, where the idea may or may not be my own in the sense of original discovery (usually not) but where the format is about the debate, not where I got my arguments from. Anytime I have been questioned on it, I have referred to my authorities, just as faithfully as for instance dhux has referred to Ayn Rand or Albert Einstein or … – and I have not used anothers actual words without saying as much,
  • c) entire posts, from message boards to Antimodernism (where I did the kind of reediting for economy as examplified below) and from there to this blog.

I have NOT copy-pasted articles someone else wrote and called them my own.

The way this would eventually look here is:

Dialogue:

angryatheist

The Bible is proven wrong by science, like astronomy …

HGL

If you mean heliocentrism, I do not consider it science.

angryatheist

Hey, if you are geocentric, consider a shrink.

HGL

No thanks, but maybe you should, Shakespear said “he who is giddy thinks the world turns around”.

angryatheist

[The Bible is proven wrong by science, like] … biology/evolution …

HGL

I do not think biology validates evolution except on a small scale of change, so called micro-evolution.

angryatheist

Right, huh! And what about dinosaurs that lived 60 million years before the Universe was created according to your Bible?

HGL

Who says these 60 million years are the true age of T. Rex et al.?

angryatheist

[The Bible is proven wrong by science, like] … and language history.

HGL

I suppose you refer to languages usually changing in other ways than the new-language shock wave at tower of Babel. For my part I do not exclude miracles. And the miracle described does not say there were no further language changes after that.

angryatheist

Qué?

HGL

The argument (already made twice or three times by dhux) usually goes: the tower of Babel is a myth explaining the difference of languages, but now we have another explanation as the one true namely slow language change, a k a linguistic evolution. My answer is that one miraculous language change, engendering heaps of new languages, does not stop these languages from further change later on, which is what linguists have observed later on.

End of Dialogue.

Now, get back to the real examples, where I have argued against real opponents on message boards, that means the other messages on this blog./HGL

[The Assorted Retorts Blog]

I am deteriorating!

In my old good days I would not have retorted: “but maybe you should” (consider a shrink) since I do not approve of shrinks. Not even for my opponents or enemies.

Someone who really appreciated this method of reedition of a debate was SC here:

HGL’s F.B. writings : Literal Truth of Genesis, Chapters 1 and 2 : Debates on more than one aspect

SUCCESSFULLY CACHED

http://assortedretorts.blogspot.com/2008/11/what-kind-of-editing-i-did-and-what.html

Please use the URL http://www.webcitation.org/6YgomdsWj to access the cached copy of this page

Advertisements

Published by

hglundahl

I might be attacking groups - if they see it as attacks. But not anonymously. My name is real, I was born in Vienna, I am Swedish. I did time, for resisting a policeman taking me to shrinks by taking his own gun for some moments (5-II-1998). I started blogging (2001) after release (in 2000).

One thought on “What kind of editing I did … and what kind of copy-pasting”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s